Environmental Education

    Materials:

Guidelines for Excellence

Key Characteristic #5 Instructional Soundness

Maple leaf Environmental education materials should rely on instructional techniques that create an effective learning environment.

5.1) Learner-centered instruction.

When appropriate, learning should he based on learner interest and on the learner's ability to construct knowledge to gain conceptual understanding.

What to look for:

5.2) Different ways of learning.

Materials should offer opportunities for different modes of teaching and learning.

What to look for:

waves

5.3) Connection to learners' everyday lives.

Materials should present information and ideas in a way that is relevant to learners.

What to look for:

5.4) Expanded learning environment.

Students should learn in environments that extend beyond the boundaries of the classroom.

What to look for:

5.5) Interdisciplinary.

The materials should recognize the interdisciplinary nature of environmental education.

What to look for:

5.6) Goals and objectives.

Goals and objectives for the materials should be clearly spelled out.

What to look for:

5.7) Appropriateness for specific learning settings.

Claims about the material's appropriateness for the targeted grade level(s) and the implementation of the activity should be consistent with the experience of educators.

What to look for:

5.8) Assessment.

A variety of means for assessing learner progress should be included in the materials.

What to look for:

Research Time Utilization The student needed continual reminders to get back to work.Work may be inappropriate to the project. The student was usually on task, but needed an occasional reminder to get back to work. All work is appropriate.
The student was always on task and did not need reminders to get back to work.
Participation In Project The student does not add an equitable amount of work to the project and does not meet all requirements for the length of presentation.
The student adds an equitable amount of work to the project, but may not meet all requirements for the length of the presentation. The student adds an equitable amount of work to the project and meets all requirements for the length of the project.
Accuracy of Information During Presentation The student's information is lacking in content and is not factually correct in many places. Information may not be pertinent to the presentation.
The student's information is for the most part factually correct. Information may not be pertinent to the presentation. The student's information is factually correct and pertinent to the presentation.
Clarity of Presentation The student's work is not well planned.The student was confused by much of the information presented.The student was not clear in explaining topics.
The student's work is well planned. There seemed to be some confusion or misinterpretation of information. The student's work is well planned and clearly explained. The student showed a clear command of the information presented.
Visual Aid Worksheet, or Simple Demonstration The device used by the student was not used at a timely place in the presentation, had little bearing on the presentation, or was absent from the presentation. The device used by the student was appropriate for the presentation. It may have been used in a more appropriate manner The design of the device may not have maximized the learning. The use of the device was timely and appropriate.The design of the device was constructed to maximize learning.

(Mayer, V.J. and Fortner, R. W. eds. Science is a Study of Earth, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1995)

next